<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Aftermath of a Shooting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekstudies.org/2007/04/in-the-aftermath-of-a-shooting/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2007/04/in-the-aftermath-of-a-shooting</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 18:46:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Tocci</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2007/04/in-the-aftermath-of-a-shooting/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tocci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 02:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstudies.org/2007/04/in-the-aftermath-of-a-shooting#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Just to follow up, it&#039;s not clear to me &lt;a href=&quot;http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/23/bush-administration-officials-talk-video-game-violence-issue-on-meet-the-press/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;why Tim Russert even brings this up&lt;/a&gt;, days after it was clear that the shooter didn&#039;t play video games. Was it filmed so far in advance that it seemed like a valid question at the time? Not only does he bring it up, but he makes a direct connection between this and the perceived need for a policy response. Please allow me to link to the Wikipedia entry on &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda-setting_theory&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;agenda-setting&lt;/a&gt; just one more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to follow up, it&#8217;s not clear to me <a href="http://gamepolitics.com/2007/04/23/bush-administration-officials-talk-video-game-violence-issue-on-meet-the-press/" rel="nofollow">why Tim Russert even brings this up</a>, days after it was clear that the shooter didn&#8217;t play video games. Was it filmed so far in advance that it seemed like a valid question at the time? Not only does he bring it up, but he makes a direct connection between this and the perceived need for a policy response. Please allow me to link to the Wikipedia entry on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda-setting_theory" rel="nofollow">agenda-setting</a> just one more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

