<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Links: Stuff I&#8217;m Posting Really Quickly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:24:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly#comment-940</guid>
		<description>Being in the magazine business, of course we&#039;re aware of how other magazines have grown and/or evolved over the years. We&#039;re still very much based around anime as our core, but being free to branch out into other areas of entertainment is not only part of the plan, but also a necessity. It shouldn&#039;t be any secret by now that the anime market isn&#039;t what it used to be even just a couple of years ago, and barring some massive turnaround, to attempt to cover it from end-to-end (and do it well) is only going to become harder as time goes on. 

Instead, we&#039;re trying to find a healthy balance of anime/manga and other entertainment that crosses over (or into) those genres. We&#039;re not interested in covering &quot;mainstream&quot; entertainment unless we can bring something new and unique to it, and so, people&#039;s fears about PiQ going all &quot;Entertainment Tonight&quot; are completely false. We just ask for people to give it a chance and see for themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being in the magazine business, of course we&#8217;re aware of how other magazines have grown and/or evolved over the years. We&#8217;re still very much based around anime as our core, but being free to branch out into other areas of entertainment is not only part of the plan, but also a necessity. It shouldn&#8217;t be any secret by now that the anime market isn&#8217;t what it used to be even just a couple of years ago, and barring some massive turnaround, to attempt to cover it from end-to-end (and do it well) is only going to become harder as time goes on. </p>
<p>Instead, we&#8217;re trying to find a healthy balance of anime/manga and other entertainment that crosses over (or into) those genres. We&#8217;re not interested in covering &#8220;mainstream&#8221; entertainment unless we can bring something new and unique to it, and so, people&#8217;s fears about PiQ going all &#8220;Entertainment Tonight&#8221; are completely false. We just ask for people to give it a chance and see for themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Tocci</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-929</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Tocci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly#comment-929</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the clarification, Robert. The author of the post linked here does seem a little confused himself by the media kit&#039;s claim that this is a &quot;name change,&quot; but I&#039;m sure there are legal-ese and business reasons why the PR folks would insist as much. 

If you happen to be following the comments on this still, I&#039;m interested in your take on that author&#039;s comparison between &lt;i&gt;PiQ&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Wizard&lt;/i&gt;. There&#039;s already a bit of hostility among some comics fans toward the latter, but &lt;i&gt;PiQ&lt;/i&gt;, of course, has the potential to get going with a clean slate. If you don&#039;t mind my asking, how do you envision it as being similar to or dissimilar from other magazines of this category?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the clarification, Robert. The author of the post linked here does seem a little confused himself by the media kit&#8217;s claim that this is a &#8220;name change,&#8221; but I&#8217;m sure there are legal-ese and business reasons why the PR folks would insist as much. </p>
<p>If you happen to be following the comments on this still, I&#8217;m interested in your take on that author&#8217;s comparison between <i>PiQ</i> and <i>Wizard</i>. There&#8217;s already a bit of hostility among some comics fans toward the latter, but <i>PiQ</i>, of course, has the potential to get going with a clean slate. If you don&#8217;t mind my asking, how do you envision it as being similar to or dissimilar from other magazines of this category?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly/comment-page-1#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geekstudies.org/2008/03/links-stuff-im-posting-really-quickly#comment-928</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t really call it a &quot;revamp&quot; at all since PiQ didn&#039;t exist in any previous form. PiQ is an entirely new magazine and despite what any press release says, it&#039;s up to our staff and our readers to determine what goes in the book, certainly not ADV or any other studio/licensor. Leave it to our PR folks to make us sound totally lame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t really call it a &#8220;revamp&#8221; at all since PiQ didn&#8217;t exist in any previous form. PiQ is an entirely new magazine and despite what any press release says, it&#8217;s up to our staff and our readers to determine what goes in the book, certainly not ADV or any other studio/licensor. Leave it to our PR folks to make us sound totally lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
